“We
hope Muslims get passed this isolated incident”, this was the language
filtered out of the western political apparatus on the mornings after
Afghan’s own “9/11”. Muslims are told to consider this as an isolated
incident; the butchery of innocent men, women, and children, yet to see
this American pledged overhaul of Afghanistan, sanctioned by the W.
Instead they were slaughtered!
Unlike Guantanamo bay long bearded, ugly hairy, and foul looking Muslim terrorists, this young misguided Christian fella, not proven guilty yet, as he could easily be still innocent, I mean the children could undoubtedly have looked at him funny, maybe gave him a terrorist look, or the sort. They may have been playing with an Islamist toy even, God forbid, as it is so written in the biblical inspired 'Fetwaas' of the Patriot Act.
Look this way FoxN/SkyN, I am full of usable ideas.
Yes, and not to get side-tracked and off topic here, this “alleged” criminal has yet to be questioned or investigated because he, as all non-Muslim Americans, has legal and constitutional rights; no one can ask him whether he was one of the peeing, the burning or the garbage-tin incidents, or if he was one of Mr. Jones’ secret yawning cells, or maybe a follower of one of the Grahams, or related to lady Geller of the Bronx. No one can ask him about his reading list. Did it include King James Bible, which could have told him to do this, and which book exactly? Let us see, could it be the book of Genesis verses 19:24, or was it the Exedus’ stoning verses in 19:12-13, or the 21:15 of children executions, or the killing of slaves in verses 21:26, or was it a different book altogether; the horrors in the books of Leviticus, Numbers, and the book of Jeremiah verses 2:30. ّI mean it is quite possible that the problem lies within the scripture. Yes i dared to say it, and may God strike me with the well of an overzealous US/EU border control officer. After all, wasn't this the exact argument used and told to Muslims before, but more loudly after, US 9/11?
Ok, I admit it! ! am going way too far here, let us not be so hastily reckless, I have a feeling that these victims had it coming, and quite deserving of what they got: an apologist self hating individual might like this part. After all, when will the Afghan get it anyway? They will always be occupied, as there is no way in hell the Christian West or else, for that matter, would ever allow for a society to prosper there. It is so unimaginatively vapid of them to even ponder existence. What are they thinking? or smoking?
The soldier is not acting on his own accord, whatever that may be, he is a product of well established conviction and a thought process within the religious and the political right, and let us not forget, my personal favorite, the opportunistic left.
When it comes to Muslims and Islam all pragmatic intellect is onboard: The old, the new, and the ambiguous. The vanity of long seemly thoughtfulness, philosophical poetry, and anti-religious thrives at the feet of Muslims’ demotion and disregard. Muslims are the occupied topic of their defenseless and vulnerable contemplation. Old are the stories of hate, and the perfidious within, new are the fancy hats and the pale faces under them.
Unlike Guantanamo bay long bearded, ugly hairy, and foul looking Muslim terrorists, this young misguided Christian fella, not proven guilty yet, as he could easily be still innocent, I mean the children could undoubtedly have looked at him funny, maybe gave him a terrorist look, or the sort. They may have been playing with an Islamist toy even, God forbid, as it is so written in the biblical inspired 'Fetwaas' of the Patriot Act.
Look this way FoxN/SkyN, I am full of usable ideas.
Yes, and not to get side-tracked and off topic here, this “alleged” criminal has yet to be questioned or investigated because he, as all non-Muslim Americans, has legal and constitutional rights; no one can ask him whether he was one of the peeing, the burning or the garbage-tin incidents, or if he was one of Mr. Jones’ secret yawning cells, or maybe a follower of one of the Grahams, or related to lady Geller of the Bronx. No one can ask him about his reading list. Did it include King James Bible, which could have told him to do this, and which book exactly? Let us see, could it be the book of Genesis verses 19:24, or was it the Exedus’ stoning verses in 19:12-13, or the 21:15 of children executions, or the killing of slaves in verses 21:26, or was it a different book altogether; the horrors in the books of Leviticus, Numbers, and the book of Jeremiah verses 2:30. ّI mean it is quite possible that the problem lies within the scripture. Yes i dared to say it, and may God strike me with the well of an overzealous US/EU border control officer. After all, wasn't this the exact argument used and told to Muslims before, but more loudly after, US 9/11?
Ok, I admit it! ! am going way too far here, let us not be so hastily reckless, I have a feeling that these victims had it coming, and quite deserving of what they got: an apologist self hating individual might like this part. After all, when will the Afghan get it anyway? They will always be occupied, as there is no way in hell the Christian West or else, for that matter, would ever allow for a society to prosper there. It is so unimaginatively vapid of them to even ponder existence. What are they thinking? or smoking?
The soldier is not acting on his own accord, whatever that may be, he is a product of well established conviction and a thought process within the religious and the political right, and let us not forget, my personal favorite, the opportunistic left.
When it comes to Muslims and Islam all pragmatic intellect is onboard: The old, the new, and the ambiguous. The vanity of long seemly thoughtfulness, philosophical poetry, and anti-religious thrives at the feet of Muslims’ demotion and disregard. Muslims are the occupied topic of their defenseless and vulnerable contemplation. Old are the stories of hate, and the perfidious within, new are the fancy hats and the pale faces under them.
3.12
